Source link
See exactly how the challenge against the decision is taken, what is the process…
In wrestling, a wrestler’s coach can challenge a decision that they feel is against them or wrong. We have to say at this time what exactly we are challenging for and after that this decision can be considered once again. The jury then again watches the video of what actually happened and examines whether the challenge to the decision is justified.
Know what actually happened in the field about Sikandar…
Sikandar Shaikh and Mahendra Gaikwad were in the final round of the clay section of the Maharashtra Kesari wrestling tournament. At that point Mahendra bowled a pitch, called outside leg. But Mahendra could not bowl this innings properly. At the same time Sikandar was not in any danger zone. If Sikandar was in the danger zone, Mahendra would have been awarded four points, but that was not the case on the field, Sikandar said. It is being said that Mahendra should have been given two marks and Sikandar one. Sikandar’s coaches could challenge the decision as to why Mahendra was awarded four points.
Sikandar told what actually happened at that time…
Sikandar told the whole story this time. He said, “Mahendra was given four marks and it was not fair. Then my coaches decided to appeal against it and they tried to challenge the decision. But at that time nobody listened to my coaches, nobody paid any attention to them.” Therefore, many fans feel that if Sikandar’s coaches had been listened to, this would not have happened.
